As a community prerogative, we have decided to move CAcert Inc from Australia to a location (as yet undecided) in Europe.  This page lists the assets that CAcert Inc holds and options for moving.  In the sense of living wills, this list can be seen as direction in the event of folding up the organisation.

Starter only.  Please add assets and suggestions.  Questions can be placed in the last section.

||Asset||Description||Best Future Home||Alternates||Comments||
||Servers||a set of computers running in Ede that handles CA, website, email and other sites|| '''Secure-U''' || || NB that Secure-U already owns the servers ||
||CA|| the Certificate Authority is a 'business' running to deliver certificates to members || Secure-U || || ||
||RA|| the Registration Authority a.k.a. web of trust is the network of assurers and the data held about those assurers and assurances || || || ||
||CCA|| the CAcert Community Agreement is a contract which is held with every member.  || || Secure-U || Transfer of CCA will require policy group approval, and approval of each member ||
||Cash at bank || The accounts holding cash at Westpac and Paypal || || || There may be association rules, regs, laws that inform on cash assets.  Likely it is limited to Australia. ||
|| non-critical services || The wiki, SVN, mail, voting tool, board decisions tool, ... || || Secure-U || ||

== Community Debate ==

Add your comments below.

 * CCA does not require policy group approval. It requires multiple changes done by Policy Group. Policy Group IS the authority that has to act. ''by Eva''
 * infrastructure servers already are with Secure-U as far as I know. ''by Eva''
 * as far as I know, Secure-U does NOT want to be a permanent "home" for the CCA. Actually it probably would violate their own internal rules. CAcert is only one of multiple projects they support. So I doubt that it is an alternative. ''by Eva''
 * the same is probably true for the CA-business. ''by Eva''
 * there also is a deliberate split between the owner of the servers, physical access to the servers and the CA. More or less all ideas in the phoenix project pointed to splitting up everything even more. There should be quite good reasons why such separation would be reduced. ''by Eva''