Times in UTC +1 10:47 -!- INOPIAE [smuxi@xdsl-89-0-74-42.netcologne.de] has joined #board-meeting 10:49 -!- R [548540de@localhost] has joined #board-meeting 10:49 -!- katzazi [smuxi@xdsl-81-173-147-131.netcologne.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 180 seconds] 10:50 -!- katzazi [smuxi@xdsl-81-173-151-11.netcologne.de] has joined #board-meeting 10:52 -!- mode/#board-meeting [+o INOPIAE] by felix 10:52 -!- mode/#board-meeting [+o R] by felix 10:52 -!- mode/#board-meeting [+o StefanT] by felix 10:53 -!- INOPIAE changed the topic of #board-meeting to: Board Meeting 2016-01-10 10:00 UTC | https://wiki.cacert.org/Brain/CAcertInc/Committee/MeetingAgendasAndMinutes/2016-01-10 10:59 -!- R is now known as ReinhardM 11:00 hello all together 11:00 Good Morning 11:00 we will wait another 5 minutes to see, if more board members will attend 11:00 Hello 11:05 hello and welcome to the board meeting 11:05 -!- mode/#board-meeting [+m ] by INOPIAE 11:05 Juergen will attend in a few minutes 11:06 -!- INOPIAE changed the topic of #board-meeting to: Board Meeting 2016-01-10 10:00 UTC| the channel is moderated for voice to board member only | https://wiki.cacert.org/Brain/CAcertInc/Committee/MeetingAgendasAndMinutes/2016-01-10 11:06 I hereby open the board meeting 11:07 1.2 Accept the minutes from the last meeting. 11:07 any comments? 11:07 -!- jmbruckner [jmbruckner@178.188.196.234] has joined #board-meeting 11:08 -!- mode/#board-meeting [+o jmbruckner] by INOPIAE 11:08 Eva did changes in the wiki to my version of the minutes 11:08 sorry im late 11:08 hello juergen, welcome to the board meeting 11:08 @felix what changes? 11:09 just have a look at https://wiki.cacert.org/Brain/CAcertInc/Committee/MeetingAgendasAndMinutes/2015-12-18?action=diff&rev1=4&rev2=3 11:09 aha .. interesting 11:11 I move to delete these additional comments. If anyone is interested in the discussion he/she should have a look inti the logfiles 11:11 the transscript is not there 11:11 should be done asap 11:12 I agree with that. 11:12 I will attached the transcript today 11:12 second and aye 11:12 i agree with the version of felix 11:12 confirm 11:12 aye 11:12 and please add the transcripts soon 11:14 OK, the motion will be presented as motion in the system 11:14 as i see the motion is accepted 11:14 so let's continue 11:14 3. Who is making minutes? 11:15 I will do the minutes of today 11:15 thanks Marcus 11:15 thank you, Marcus 11:15 4. Chair asks whether cacert-board-private maillist includes any items that need to be disclosed to Members. 11:15 no items 11:16 so far i know, no items 11:16 5. Chair asks whether cacert-board maillist includes any business items that aren't on the agenda yet. 11:16 no items 11:16 same as above 11:16 nothing from me 11:17 6. Chair introduces the URL of action items to the meeting, and asks for discussion. 11:17 no action items 11:18 we did not use them yet and therefore have none 11:18 let's go oon with 2. Businesses 11:18 Personal matters 11:19 2.1.1 accept the membership application of Janis Streib and Neal Oakey 11:20 I move to do the acceptance for each one separately 11:20 lets do that seperately for each of them please 11:20 I accept the membership for Janis Streib 11:20 second and AYE 11:20 Aye 11:20 aye 11:21 aye 11:21 OK, Janis Streib is accepted a new member 11:22 Secretary, please write a message and treasurer will give the details for membership fees 11:22 I accept the membership of Neal Oakey 11:23 second, AYE 11:23 Aye 11:23 aye 11:23 aye 11:23 OK, Neal Oakey is accepted as a new member. 11:23 Secretary, please write a message and treasurer will give the details for membership fees 11:24 2.1.2 two members resigned their membership 11:24 this is an information for all 11:24 2.2 OFT report 11:25 2.2.1 missing feedback by Kevin 11:25 has anyone any information from our Public Officer? 11:26 no 11:26 I dont have any information, but please dont forgot we had holidays around the world 11:27 OK 11:27 2.2.2 list of lodged documents 11:27 we have the list and can work on it 11:28 I saw that there are many of the documents are missing in the SVN 11:28 that is a breach of our princile of Open Governance 11:29 so the communication with the OFT was not properly documented... 11:29 @felix .. sadly it wasn't 11:29 see our statutes rule 23 11:30 I expect some surprise in the coming days 11:35 Shall we ask our members if they have any idea about the missing documents? 11:36 Another hint that handovers did fail in the past 11:36 During handover these documents had to be there 11:37 The act requires that we keep a book of custody 11:38 we shall prepare a motion 11:38 yes indeed 11:38 maybe that a former Public Officer has all documents? 11:38 let's continue 11:38 2.3 closing of Westpac savings account as the earnings are less than on the transaction account and transfer the money to the transaction account 11:39 Treasurer, please give some more details 11:39 I remember that i did discuss this with Michael last year, but we did not continue on it 11:39 that was a proposal to increase the earning at Westpac Bank 11:40 OK, sounds good 11:40 I prepare a motion 11:41 I move to transfer the money from Wetpac savings account to Wetpac tranaction account and close the savings account thereafter 11:41 seciond T aye 11:41 Aye 11:42 aye 11:42 aye 11:42 OK, motion CARRIED 11:42 let's continue 11:42 2.4 Poll to see the position of members towards Audit 11:43 there are a lot of rumors happening behind the scenes. 11:43 One point but not the least is that "someone" postponed the meeting on 2016-01-29 for root resign procedure. 11:44 We should ask our members, if they want to continue as a Certificate Authority. 11:44 At Events, almost every community member asks for the Audit 11:45 The question will be send to our INC members only. 11:45 sounds good to me 11:45 We want to collect rough consensus and evidence gathering. 11:45 NO BALLOT! 11:46 I think it is a good idea to see the posiotion of our INC memberst. 11:46 How do you want to do the ballot? 11:46 We should use DOODLE 11:47 NO BALLOT, but a voting to gain rogh consensus! 11:47 OK 11:47 how secure are personal datas of our members there? 11:50 we could also do a simle HTML-form on CAcert software... 11:50 ääh on Cacert hardware 11:51 with manually built software... 11:51 the question here should be, that we want to do such oppinion gathering. 11:51 which i prefer 11:52 i would also prefer to do this poll on CAcert hardware 11:52 I move to do the poll 11:52 the system will be appointed after this meeting 11:52 we will discuss the need for privacy. 11:53 Just to do the poll but no decision which software to be used? 11:53 YES 11:53 second & aye 11:53 aye 11:53 AYE 11:53 aye 11:53 AYE 11:53 but i think we should keep the Doodle-Poll as 'backup' if its not possible to do this on CAcert Hardware 11:53 OK, motion CARRIED 11:54 next topic 2.5 ownership of Google+ account 11:55 well i asked our former PR-Officer 2 times to handover Admin- and/or Owner-Rights of the G+ page last year 11:55 the result was that he did remove all other admins except himself and another (former Board-Member) 11:55 Did you get any answer? 11:55 no concrete answers 11:56 As I have seen he is using the CAcert logo! 11:56 And he is no official representative of CAcert INC. 11:57 Alex just stated that "there is now ownership of a G+-Page" 11:57 that was all i got as answer from him 11:57 I think we should ask the current owners/admins one last time to handover the account. 11:57 ACK 11:58 Yes i think so too 11:58 Juergen will you please write that email? 11:58 yes okay 11:58 fix the date for an expected answer to 14 days please 11:58 yes, allright 11:58 afte that time has passed we will decide what to do. 11:59 next topic 2.6 Investigation committee 11:59 Currently 2 persons has agreed to join the investigation committee. 12:00 sorry, fire-brigade-alarm, have to run... 12:00 One is of profession lawyer, the second one is a data privacy professional. 12:00 I move to implement the investigation committee and try to fill it up with a third person. 12:01 second & aye 12:01 aye 12:01 aye 12:02 Juergen has left. He will gicve his answer in the motion system. 12:03 next topic 12:03 3. Question Time 12:03 please open the channel 12:03 -!- mode/#board-meeting [-m ] by INOPIAE 12:04 Answer to katzazi 12:04 All q´your questions will be answered by the investigation committee. 12:05 they were answers to you not to any committe who cannot answer thenm 12:05 that committee is not board and cannot answer for board 12:06 also I will not accept such a committee 12:06 IMHO board will be questioned by the investigation committee as well as the members in question. 12:06 but it was a members question not a question of a committee or anything else 12:06 those were questions about your work and not mine 12:07 and as far as I understand you that committee should investigate my or other persons work and not board work 12:07 so you should answer on your own 12:07 can you please name the lawyer for that committee 12:08 Our answer is the implementation of such an investigation committee. 12:08 that is not an answer to those quesitons 12:09 another question: why did you not address the recent comments from critical and access team? 12:09 what is the name of the lawyer? 12:09 The answer was already given in topic 2.4 12:09 no 12:10 there were no names 12:10 names are privat concerns 12:10 you want me to be affected to I have a right to learn that name 12:10 also I have reasons to doubt that you have found such a lawyer 12:11 that is your circling method 12:11 therefor we want the investigation committee. 12:11 so that you do not have to answer any questions? 12:11 We see the results coming from a third party. That will be the base of a solution. 12:12 no 12:12 it will not a base for a solution 12:12 what about just telling us what the issues are? 12:12 So if you do not accept the investigation committee as you wrote already, we have to make a decision? 12:12 no you have to name the allegations 12:12 and go to arbitration 12:12 those are our rules 12:12 Are there any more questions from the floor? 12:12 there are no other rules 12:13 yes 12:13 I asked one above 12:13 Are there any more questions from the floor? 12:13 why did you not address that critical team and access team have announced to stop their work 12:13 because of recent board activities 12:13 also: why did you not answer the questions raised on board public? 12:14 critical team and access team are not related to the investigation committee or are they now under that committee as well? 12:15 also why are you censoring the questions of the members? 12:15 and what is missing for the OTF report? 12:16 why do you not use email for your non-poll? 12:16 when will you bring up the topics of the last board? 12:17 where was it changed that the cacert logo is under open license so cannot be used by someone else on their website? 12:19 you should be able to answer at least some of those questions now, as they were about topics handled today and any board member could have asked according questions as well so you should have an answer prepared 12:23 -!- mode/#board-meeting [-m ] by INOPIAE 12:23 -!- mode/#board-meeting [+m ] by INOPIAE 12:24 We decided to give a quarterly management report. That will be published in our wiki system. 12:25 When will be the next meeting? 12:25 2016-01+-24 10 UTC? 12:25 ACK 12:25 OK 12:25 yes 12:26 Thanks to all for attending the meeting. 12:26 Have anice sunday. 12:26 I hereby close the meeting. 12:26 Good bye 12:26 good bye 12:26 bey 12:26 -!- ReinhardM [548540de@localhost] has left #board-meeting