Audit impacts on with Oophaga.

Audit Points

The audit impacts Oophaga in the following ways:

  1. inventory of hardware
    • discussed 20081215 ("Subject: [Audit] how to review hardware?")
    • requested by teus 20081215 ("Subject: Request for Oophaga inventory list used for CAcert services")
    • probably should be documented in SM?
  2. facility info for SM's Facility small subsection

    • requested 20081007, 20081201, 20090114 ("Subject: Facility questions")
  3. Bylaws for Oophaga -- available in english?
  4. contract between Oophaga and CAcert.
    • addresses commercial v. non-profit angle but not wider conflicts
    • should probably apply SM over administrators
  5. Oophaga hardware administrators
    • currently all CAcert Assurers, but where is this written as a requirement? SM?
    • as a requirement, "Assurer" status substantially covers the conflicts of interest
    • is more required?

Note that this is an emerging list, not complete. Numbering above reflects that they are points that should be covered in the review of audit.

Communications Process

Liason at Oophaga end is Robert K, board member of Oophaga and CAcert Assurer.

http://oophaga.nl/images/oofroga_found_logo.png


CategoryAudit

Audit/OophagaInformation (last edited 2009-10-11 16:36:14 by UlrichSchroeter)