* Case Number: a20150125.1
  * Status: init
  * Claimant: Benny Baumann
  * Respondent: CAcert
  * initial Case Manager: UlrichSchroeter, later EvaStöwe disclosed dispute based on DRO decision [[https://community.cacert.org/board/motions.php?motion=m20161119.3|m20161119.3]] and [[https://community.cacert.org/board/motions.php?motion=m20161119.4|m20161119.4]]
  * Case Manager: name case manager
  * Arbitrator: name arbitrator
  * Date of arbitration start: 201Y-MM-DD
  * Date of ruling: 201Y-MM-DD
  * Case closed: 201Y-MM-DD
  * Complaint: Dispute for sending out a mail from the webdb regarding bug 649

  * Relief: TBD

Before: Arbitrator name arbitrator (A), Respondent: name respondent (R), Claimant: Benny Baumann (C), Case: a20150125.1

<<TableOfContents(2)>>

== History Log ==
 . 2015-01-25 (issue.c.o): case [[Ticket:344978|s20150125.148]]
 . 2015-09-09 (iCM): added to wiki, request for CM / A, notification sent


== Private Part ==

 * '''Link to Arbitration case [[Arbitrations/priv/a20150125.1|a20150125.1 (Private Part)]]'''

## ==> INCLUDE SECTION BOT
<<Include(Arbitrations/priv/a20150125.1)>>  
## <== INCLUDE SECTION EOT

==== EOT Private Part ====

== Original Dispute ==

 {{{
> As noted in the attached mail by Marcus M[..], he is "not authorized"
> to file a dispute (which according to our policies every member can do)
> on subjects related to Software.
> 
> As bug 649 deals with sending automated mails and members of the
> Arbitration team argued that EVERY automatic mail must be approved of by
> an Arbitration ruling I hereby want to file a dispute to resolve the
> following question (cf. original wording in the mail attached):
> 
> "Is the WebDB software allowed to send out the automatic mail
> notification in bug 649 to inform about the issue raised in the
> referenced bug[1]."
> 
> The question of Marcus' dispute is of great concern to Software too and
> thus the Software Assessment Team want's Arbitration to resolve this
> question.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Benny Baumann
> CAcert Software Assessment Team
> 
> [1] https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=649
}}}

mail attached and referenced in this dispute:
 {{{
Dear Benny,

according to Eva Stöwes statement each message that is send out 
automatically from the webDB, I request that arbitration is checking if 
the mail that is send in bug 649 [1]  to the member that assurer status 
is check can be done.

Lines 612 to 622 www/wot.php

         $subject = "[CAcert.org] ". _("Assurer status report for you");

         $body  = sprintf(_("Hi %s,"), $assurer['fname'])."\n\n";
         $body .= sprintf(_("%s %s (%s) has requested your assurer 
status for %s."),
             $_SESSION['profile']['fname'],
             $_SESSION['profile']['lname'],
             $_SESSION['profile']['email'],
             $reason)."\n\n";
         $body .= sprintf(_("The transmitted result: %s"), $status)."\n";
         $body .= _("Best regards")."\n";
         $body .= _("CAcert Support Team");


Please forward this mail to arbitration as I was told that I am not 
allowed to send any dispute regarding software issues.

[1] https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=649


Thanks in advance

-- 
mit freundlichen Gruessen / best regards
Marcus M[...]
}}}

## You may remove unneeded sections at your discretion...
== Discovery ==

== Elaboration ==

== Ruling ==

== Execution ==

== Similiar Cases ==

|| [[Arbitrations/a20YYMMDD.n|a20YYMMDD.n]] || [[Arbitrations/a20YYMMDD.n|<discription>]] ||

----
 . CategoryArbitration

''' and please add one of the following Topics, delete the rest. See also [[Arbitrations/Training/Lesson06|Lesson06]] '''

 . CategoryArbCaseSystemTasks
 . CategoryArbCaseOthers