* Case Number: a20150114.3 * Status: init * Claimant: EvaStöwe * Respondent: MartinGummi, UlrichSchroeter * initial Case Manager: UlrichSchroeter, later EvaStöwe disclosed dispute based on DRO decision [[https://community.cacert.org/board/motions.php?motion=m20161119.4|m20161119.4]] * Case Manager: name case manager * Arbitrator: name arbitrator * Date of arbitration start: 201Y-MM-DD * Date of ruling: 201Y-MM-DD * Case closed: 201Y-MM-DD * Complaint: Dispute against the Arbitrator and CM of [[Arbitrations/a20150114.1|a20150114.1]] * Relief: TBD Before: Arbitrator name arbitrator (A), Respondent: MartinGummi (R1) UlrichSchroeter (R2), Claimant: EvaStöwe (C), Case: a20150114.3 <> == History Log == . 2015-01-14 (issue.c.o): case [[Ticket:343189|s20150114.41]] . 2015-09-08 (iCM): added to wiki, request for CM / A, notification sent to (C), (R1), (R2) . 2015-09-08 (iCM): notification forward to Benedikt as named in dispute filing as addtl. party . 2015-09-09 (C): comment to notification == Private Part == * '''Link to Arbitration case [[Arbitrations/priv/a20150114.3|a20150114.3 (Private Part)]]''' ## ==> INCLUDE SECTION BOT <> ## <== INCLUDE SECTION EOT ==== EOT Private Part ==== == Original Dispute == {{{ I hereby file a dispute against the Arbitrator and CM of a20150114.1 because of unfair treatment. Both the Arbitrator and the Case Manager of the case have not picked up a case within months. There are a lot of urgent cases lying around. The case a20150114.1 has no urgency at all. To pick up this case while leaving other cases untreated as the claimant is a person who has quite a standing in the community asks for a quick handling of this case. This is unfair treatment. (The other cases can lead to legal or security issues, if not handled, soon.) Also Arbitration team has discussed how to prioritise cases some time. This did not lead to a lesson in the wiki but there were no objections, the Arbitrator participated in the discussion. Sure, if a case can be handled easily it is ok to give it some time in between. But if Arbitrator who get active only now and again move a case without urgency through all stages so soon, there is a problem. Currently there are at least 9 other cases untreated in the OTRS which should have had priority by handling them. I also objected at the Arbitration mailing list about this. If my objection is handled with due seriousness, I will withdraw this dispute. mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards Eva Stöwe }}} ## You may remove unneeded sections at your discretion... == Discovery == == Elaboration == == Ruling == == Execution == == Similiar Cases == || [[Arbitrations/a20150114.1|a20150114.1]] || [[Arbitrations/a20150114.1|query to get data for Web of trust Graph]] || ---- . CategoryArbitration . CategoryArbCaseOthers