* Case Number: a20140927.1
  * Status: closed
  * Claimant: Benedikt H as internal Auditor
  * Respondent: CAcert
  * initial Case Manager: EvaStöwe
  * Case Manager: name EvaStöwe
  * Arbitrator: MarioLipinski
  * Date of arbitration start: 2014-10-31
  * Date of ruling: 2014-10-31
  * Case closed: 2014-10-31
  * Complaint: Audit request for ABC questionnaire

  * Relief: TBD

Before: Arbitrator Mario Lipinski (A), Respondent: CAcert (R), Claimant: Benedikt H as internal Auditor (C), Case: a20140927.1


== History Log ==
 . 2014-09-27 (issue.c.o): case [s20140921.80 ]
 . 2014-10-02 (iCM): added to wiki, request for CM / A
 . 2014-10-02 (iCM): notified C about case
 . 2014-10-26 (iCM): asked two arbitrators if they would pick up the case as A or CM, both had no time
 . 2014-10-31 (CM): I'll take this case as CM, Mario Lipinski will be the Arbitrator
 . 2014-10-31 (CM): init mail sent to C
 . 2014-10-31 (A): ruling sent to C, CM
 . 2014-10-31 (CM): executed ruling by sending a copy of questions encrypted to C, A
 . 2014-10-31 (CM): closed case

== Private Part ==
 * '''Link to Arbitration case [[Arbitrations/priv/a20140927.1|a20140927.1 (Private Part)]], Access for (CM) + (A) only'''
## ==> INCLUDE SECTION BOT
<<Include(Arbitrations/priv/a20140927.1)>>  
## <== INCLUDE SECTION EOT

==== EOT Private Part ====

== original Dispute ==

 {{{
Dear Arbitrators,

As CAcert's Auditor, I kindly request to release CAcert's ABC
questionnaire to me, for closing the Audit on Arbitrated Background Check.

The questionnaire is required to match SP's requirements against the
document and identify compliance between Policy and execution.

I kindly request to handle this case urgent! Since there are ABCs
pending / newly requested.
}}}

== Discovery ==

== Ruling ==
Dear Benedikt,

for the case "Audit request for ABC questionnaire" that is recorded
under the number a20140927.1 I come to the following ruling.

C should get access to a copy of the questionnaire used by the
arbitration team during Arbitrated Background Checks. CM should send a
copy. That questionnaire is no controlled document, but shared within
the arbitration team. Other arbitrators may use another version of the
document.

Reasoning: First, there is no policy that defines how to handle the ABC
questionnaire. However, it is kept private within the arbitration team
to limit the respondent to prepare verbatim answers to the issues
addressed in the interview.
C already attended an ABC interview a20140124.1 and is aware of the procedure
and questions asked. The request for a copy to check during his audit on
Arbitrated Background Checks is reasonable.

Braunschweig, 2014-10-31<<BR>>
Mario Lipinski

== Execution ==
 . 2014-10-31 (A): ruling sent to C, CM
 . 2014-10-31 (CM): sent a copy of the questions used in the interview of a20140124.1 encrypted to A, C

== Similiar Cases ==
|| [[Arbitrations/a20140124.1|a20140124.1]] || [[Arbitrations/a20140124.1|Arbitrated Background Check over Eva S]] ||

----
 . CategoryArbitration
 . CategoryArbCaseOthers