History Log

Private Part

EOT Private Part

original Dispute

(There were active certificates found by Support and at least partly revoked by C, before dispute was handed over to Arbitration)

Discovery

The account matches the prerequisites of the precedents ruling in a20140713.1.

Ruling

The account of the claimant should be closed with the process defined in precedents case a20140713.1[2] with the following adjustment, as this case matches the prerequisite defined there.

As the claimant is no longer an assurer, the CAcert Reliance Statement (CARS) about the destruction of the CAcert Assurance Program (CAP) forms cannot be given in this case. Instead the claimant should be asked to destroy the CAP forms at the required time, as he promised the assurees to do, when he signed the CAP forms. He should also be asked to confirm this.

If the confirmation is not given after three reminders with a sensible response time, the account should be closed, but the claimant remains responsible for the CAP forms and their destruction and may be contacted about them by the assurees or persons authorised by an Arbitrator.

Support should give a status report to the Arbitrator and Case Manager of this case, when the account is closed.

Cologne, 2014-11-10
Eva Stöwe

Execution

Support received a copy of the ruling as execution request.

Similiar Cases

a20110319.1

Name Change after Marriage (Peter F)

a20111128.3

Delete Account cases to handle by SE - No Assurances given, no certs or certs expired - Precedents Case {i}

a20080702.1

User requests to delete account with Assurance Points

a20090618.3

Assurer requests to delete account

a20090328.1

Assurer wants his account deleted

a20100907.1

letter of resignation

a20110110.1

Please Delete my Account (Is Assurer)

a20110131.1

Account Removal Olivier F (Is Assurer)

a20090510.3

Assurer with alter-ego even assured himself more than once

a20140123.1

Close my assurer account (Martin M)

a20140713.1

delete assurer account Precedents Case {i} delete assurer account