Hi All,

I recently attended the assurers training in Amsterdam and realised the data in my passport and driver's license doesn't match the details as known by cacert.org:

Passport: Antonius Laurentius Franciscus Huiskens
Drivers licens: Antonius L F Huiskens

My cacert.org account is linked to <snip>

I discussed this with Lambert, and after verification of my passport and driver's license, he suggested I file a name dispute at this very alias.

So, what can be done about this?

thanks in advance,
Antoon

Before: Arbitrator UlrichSchroeter (A). Respondent: CAcert (R) Claimant: Antonius L F Huiskens (C) Case: a20090619.1

As you already will expect I personally find this a mis-use of the VIP
assurance. The question should not be 'am I technically allowed to use the
VIP assurance in such a case', but 'is it a wise thing to ask my senior
assurers to jump into their cars, find an unknown person, and assure him'.

The VIP program should only be used in extremely rare cases, as it requires
much extra effort of our senior assurers. When a VIP assurance is ordered in
each and any ruling, in very short time nobody wil treat the VIP assurance
as 'extra value', only as 'extra burden'.

And as 'old' rulings are often used as an example for a current ruling,
chances are that other arbitrators will start thinking 'oh, that's the way I
am supposed to do', and start ordering VIP assurances also.

Date

Assurer

mets change requirement

2009-02-26

Cornelis S

AS1

choice-cancel.gif

2009-02-26

Peter G

AS2

2009-02-26

Michael H

AS3

choice-cancel.gif

2009-02-26

Rudi D

AS4

choice-cancel.gif

2009-02-26

Joost V

AS5

Assurer

mets change req requirements?

Cornelis S

AS1

choice-yes.gif

Joost V

AS5

choice-yes.gif

TB

AS6

choice-yes.gif

TS

AS7

Discovery

I've been reassured by Hans and several others at that occasion (well,
it was the 14th of dec).

I'll check with Hans to see what happened. Two of them: Theodoor
 and Tor Assured me from what I can see.

I know for sure that Hans also assured me, and I seem to remember a fourth.

Ruling

Frankfurt/Main Jan 29th, 2010

Execution

Similar Cases

a20090621.2

User not registered under full names


Arbitrations/a20090619.1 (last edited 2010-02-01 22:56:49 by UlrichSchroeter)